The Independent’s US politics newsletter
SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE

May 12, 2025

View in browser

 
Inside Washington
Inside Washington

No, Trump won’t benefit from an indictment

As everyone waits to see whether the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg will actually indict former president Donald Trump, Washington DC has emerged with a new talking point: Criminal charges will actually help the former president.

Senator Joe Manchin, by far the most endangered Democratic incumbent who hails from a state Trump won by almost 30 points, told Punchbowl News that “I think it could have the reverse effect of what people might be thinking" and actually help the former president.

Senator Marco Rubio told me “for Democrats it’s counterproductive, politically, I think it's gonna backfire.”

 

However, Montana Senator Jon Tester, who represents a state that also voted for Trump by double digits, told me “nobody's above the law. If he’s guilty of crimes and he's held accountable just like me or you or anybody else". 

It’s easy to get that impression after eight years of Trump upending people’s expectations of politics. Trump called John McCain a loser and then went on to win the Republican nomination. Trump won the presidency weeks after the audio of him bragging about sexually assaulting women leaked. And, of course, an overwhelming majority of Republicans opposed impeaching Trump after he incited a riot at the US Capitol.

All of this has led to an impression that the former president is the “Teflon Don.” But as of right now, it seems many are misinterpreting the moment. 

“There's this temptation with Trump to attribute method to some of the madness, and I just don't think it's there, largely,” Zac McCrary, a Democratic pollster at Impact Research, told me. “I think, myself included, a lot of us have been more wrong about Trump than right about Trump going back nearly a decade.”

Gunner Ramer, the political director of the anti-Trump Republican Accountability Project, offered a reminder that nobody can predict the future. But he said an indictment could do two things. 

“I think, in the short term, there could be a rally around Trump,” he said. “But I think the real open question is, long term, is the consequence of an indictment another sort of point for Republican primary voters to look at? And it's a sign of political baggage.” 

Ramer said that after the January 6 select committee hearings, support for the former president diminished because even Trump supporters may have still liked him but feared their friends and loved ones would not support him. 

That changed after the FBI executed a search warrant for documents from Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago, which led to a rally around him. But that ultimately fizzled when his hand-picked candidates flopped in the 2022 midterms. 

“And again, it was this political calculation that Donald Trump has too much baggage. ‘I still very much like him, but enough people don’t,’” Mr Ramer said of potential supporters of Trump.

But that doesn’t mean Trump’s opponents will benefit even if an indictment hurts the former president, McCrary said. In the 2016 primary, Trump sucked all the oxygen from the political debate. 

“Even when there were attacks on him going after other Republicans, Trump just sort of blocked out the sun,” he said. “And that caused all the other flowers in the garden to wither and die.”

That doesn’t mean he thinks an indictment would help Mr Trump. 

If anything, Ramer said, a potential indictment could serve as a boon to the current runner-up: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who is set to announce his 2024 campaign sometime in the summer. DeSantis’ numbers have taken a dive in recent weeks after he made an unforced error when he called the war in Ukraine a “territorial dispute” and Mr Trump has hammered his former political protege.

“They very much like Ron DeSantis, but they see Ron DeSantis in relation to Trump,” Ramer said of the Florida governor's supporters. “They see him as someone fighting the culture wars, and, as people said, 'Trump without the baggage.' Trump not on steroids.'”

Of course, all of this is remains hypothetical. As of right now, Trump remains a free man and DeSantis has not officially declared.

But the idea that an indictment will immediately benefit Trump has little grounding in actual facts and is more driven by fear. For Republicans, it’s fear that they will lose his voters if they do not come to his defence. For Democrats, it’s a trauma response after seeing him win one too many times. 

 

Reading list

Alex Woodward: ‘Deepfake’ images of Trump’s arrest preview potential for harm and mass disruption in elections and media


Gustaf Kilander: Ron DeSantis doesn’t recall eating pudding with three fingers on private flight

 

Enjoying this newsletter?

Unlock unlimited, ad-free reading on the website and in The Independent app when you subscribe – plus, benefit from our welcome offer when you join today.

 

What else you need to know today

  • Ron DeSantis has broken his silence on allegations that he observed the force-feeding of detainees at Guantanamo Bay during his time serving as a Navy lawyer there. The Independent reported last week on claims by a former prisoner of the prison camp, Mansoor Adayfi, that Mr DeSantis observed his brutal force-feeding by guards during a hunger strike in 2006 – a practice the United Nations characterised as torture. Mr DeSantis was stationed on the base between March 2006 and January 2007, according to his military records, and part of his role involved hearing complaints and concerns from prisoners over their conditions. “I was a junior officer. I didn’t have authority to authorise anything,” Mr DeSantis told Piers Morgan, in an interview to be broadcast on Thursday. “There may have been a commander that would have done feeding if someone was going to die, but that was not something that I would have even had authority to do.”

  • Donald Trump stirred a media frenzy with a false expectation of his imminent arrest and the charges against him while a grand jury in New York City continued to hear witnesses and evidence in a case involving the former president’s hush money payment to an adult film star. The Manhattan grand jury has been meeting since January, but Mr Trump’s announcement on 18 March has put its actions under a microscope in anticipation of an indictment. New York County District Attorney Alvin Bragg called off the grand jury on 22 March, and the jury will not hear the highly scrutinised case on 23 March, pushing any potential indictments until next week at the earliest. There are a number of reasons why a grand jury hearing for a specific case would be delayed, canceled or rescheduled, including scheduling conflicts, illness and other court matters, as well as other cases that the grand juries are considering. That’s not uncommon. Grand juries can typically hear multiple cases at a time. Prosecutors in New York are reviewing hundreds of cases. So the grand jury in Mr Trump’s case is likely not the only one on its agenda.

 
 

We noticed that you might not be registered

By registering, you will enjoy limited access to Independent Premium articles, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

REGISTER FOR FREE
 

Articles available exclusively to subscribers

Editorial, The Independent: The departure of Peter Murrell as Scottish National Party chief executive was overdue

 

OTHER NEWSLETTERS YOU MIGHT LIKE

Race Report

The Race Report

Fortnightly, 6pm (UK time)

Written by Nadine White

Join now

Health Check

Health Check

Every Thursday, 7am (UK time)

Written by Rebecca Thomas

Join now

If you can spare a minute we’d love your feedback on our newsletters.

The Independent

Join the conversation or follow us

FacebookTwitter

Download the free Independent app

Please do not reply directly to this email.

 

You are currently registered to receive The Independent's Inside Washington email.


Add us to your safe list of senders

.

If you do not want to receive The Independent's Inside Washington email, please unsubscribe.


If you no longer wish to receive any newsletters or promotional emails from
The Independent, you can unsubscribe here.

 

This e-mail was sent by Independent Digital News and Media Ltd, 14-18 Finsbury Square, London EC2A 1AH. Registered in England and Wales with company number 07320345.


Read our privacy notice and cookie policy.